Graphic Organizers in Math
To study vocabulary, graphic organizers are very helpful in
mathematics. It allows the opportunity
for students to store information in all different medias, like words and
pictures, in one place so that their understanding of the selected word is intensified. One of the most popular graphic organizers I
have seen is the Frayer model. This
includes an almost web-type model with the vocabulary word in the center and
sections surrounding it including the definition, characteristics, examples,
and non-examples. This is a great way
for students to organize higher order information about a topic in an easy to
use organizer that deepens understanding both during the creation process, and
studying it afterwards. Another type of
organizer is a semantic map. This is a
web that has a central idea, like a vocabulary word, with multiple branches for
information relating to that word (McLaughlin, 2015). Another useful graphic organizer could be a
concept of definition map. This is
another web-type organizer with a central idea.
This organizer is designed to help students make connections with their
prior knowledge (McLaughlin, 2015). This
web has a central idea with clusters of branches with headings like “what is
it?” or “what are key features?” These kinds
of organizers can also aide students in determining important information from
a source, which is definitely an important skill, if not one of the most
important literacy skills.
For my post, I decided to detail the Frayer model
method. In mathematics, this model has
some especially useful features that will help students understanding of the
concept. The purpose of this organizer is to allow students to organize
specific information in a way that is clear, neat, and useful. The Frayer model has the potential to also become
a powerful study tool due to the density of highly potent information is a
seemingly simple set up. The model is
not only clear and concise for readability and simplicity, but the portions
included demand that students think deeper about the topic, therefor, improving
comprehension and understanding. Another
huge benefit is the inclusion of examples and non-examples. At least in Maryland or other locations where
Algebra 1 students must take the PARCC exam, knowledge of non-examples is very
valuable. On open-ended questions on the
PARCC where students are asked to “justify” their answer, an acceptable
justification is an example and non-example explanation. By using this model and focusing on the
understanding of a concept via example/non-example, we are better preparing
students fro this state exam by filling their toolbox with this method of
thinking. I think this is an awesome
connection and a useful piece of information for mathematics teachers in
Maryland. Overall, I think this method
has many benefits, and I have actually already been using this model on my
classes today. The students definitely
tend to enjoy completing these and they are left with a valuable study tool
afterwards. Like most graphic organizers in math, it is not only an educational
process of completing them and filling out the sections, but it also creates a
new summarized resource for students to looks back to. That skill of not only creating their own
study resources (notes) but also going back to them in times of need is a
highly important skill needing to be developed and graphic organizers provide a
great method to do so.
McLaughlin, M. (2015). Content area reading:
Teaching and learning for college and career readiness (2nd ed.).
Pearson.

Caitlin,
ReplyDeleteI believe your use of the Frayer model is a great choice for not only Parabola but for your term Parabola. I like your use of the example and non-example sections by showing images to help with the understanding. Great mix of images and words for your map. You state you were using this map with your students, are there any other mapping strategies that we learned about in this reading that you have used and how were they received by your students?
Jennifer
Caitlin,
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting to see exactly how some of these strategies are used in other disciplines (not just science) and how specifically they come in handy for such things as state exams. Anytime a student can go back and use notes outside of just that unit it will help to signify further importance of their studies. I like the Frayer model in that it definitely breaks down important information for students, I have noticed however that sometimes students can over-word their notes in these and at times place too much support in the respective sections. Do you ever talk to your students about how much they should be filling these out in terms of length of content, and if so what are your suggestions in keeping it simple and to the point?
Caitlin,
ReplyDeleteI like how you included information about standardized testing (PARCC) in your blog this week. My entire elementary school (PreK-8) is working on improving our students' math (geometry) scores on the IOWA test this year. Using the Frayer model with mathematics vocabulary could be a valuable asset to us as we attempt to improve our students' knowledge in this area.
Great job!
Caitlin,
ReplyDeleteGreat strategy! Anything that students can use as study material will help increase their motivation in completing it. As the others mentioned, this model can be used across disciplines for a variety of words. I also think it's helpful to show non-examples especially since students will be tested in this area and by having them see this more often as a previewing technique, it will help them come test time. As I think back to my high school math classes, there was no emphasis in reading and learning vocabulary although the expectation was that you should know the terms. How would you introduce graphic organizers to students who may not be used to seeing it in a math setting?